[Bug 1975691] Re: Remove SAUCE patches from test_vxlan_under_vrf.sh in net of ubuntu_kernel_selftests

** Description changed:

[Impact]
- test_vxlan_under_vrf.sh should not be failing anymore (unless it's a
- kernel config related issue) with patches submitted for fixing this
- test in bug 1871015.
+ test_vxlan_under_vrf.sh should not be failing anymore with patches
+ submitted to fix it in bug 1871015 (unless it's a kernel config
+ related issue).

- We should remove the SAUCE patches that mark "vxlan_under_vrf" test
- failure as expected failure to catch regressions in the future.
+ With the regression-testing result hinting system available, we should
+ remove the SAUCE patches that mark "vxlan_under_vrf" test failure as
+ an expected failure to catch regressions in the future. This could
+ reduce maintenance cost as well.

[Fix]
Revert the following patches:
* UBUNTU: SAUCE: selftests: net: Make test for VXLAN underlay in non-default VRF an expected failure
* UBUNTU: SAUCE: selftests: net: Don't fail test_vxlan_under_vrf on xfail

[Test]
- Tested with F/I/J/F-oem-5.14/J-oem-5.17.
+ Patched test script tested with F/I/J/F-oem-5.14/J-oem-5.17. I have
+ also modify the test case to fail it deliberately to verify this
+ change, it works as expected.

[Where problems could occur]
Change limit to test cases, should not have any real impact to any
kernel functions. We may see failures reported from this test in
our SRU regression-testing report in the future, but it means we're
doing the right thing.

** Description changed:

[Impact]
test_vxlan_under_vrf.sh should not be failing anymore with patches
submitted to fix it in bug 1871015 (unless it's a kernel config
related issue).

With the regression-testing result hinting system available, we should
- remove the SAUCE patches that mark "vxlan_under_vrf" test failure as
+ remove the SAUCE patches that mark "underlay in a VRF" test failure as
an expected failure to catch regressions in the future. This could
reduce maintenance cost as well.

[Fix]
Revert the following patches:
* UBUNTU: SAUCE: selftests: net: Make test for VXLAN underlay in non-default VRF an expected failure
* UBUNTU: SAUCE: selftests: net: Don't fail test_vxlan_under_vrf on xfail

[Test]
Patched test script tested with F/I/J/F-oem-5.14/J-oem-5.17. I have
also modify the test case to fail it deliberately to verify this
change, it works as expected.

[Where problems could occur]
Change limit to test cases, should not have any real impact to any
kernel functions. We may see failures reported from this test in
our SRU regression-testing report in the future, but it means we're
doing the right thing.

--
You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to linux
in Ubuntu.
Matching subscriptions: Bgg, Bmail, Nb
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1975691

Title:
Remove SAUCE patches from test_vxlan_under_vrf.sh in net of
ubuntu_kernel_selftests

Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests:
In Progress
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
In Progress
Status in linux-oem-5.14 package in Ubuntu:
Invalid
Status in linux-oem-5.17 package in Ubuntu:
Invalid
Status in linux source package in Focal:
In Progress
Status in linux-oem-5.14 source package in Focal:
In Progress
Status in linux-oem-5.17 source package in Focal:
Invalid
Status in linux source package in Impish:
In Progress
Status in linux-oem-5.14 source package in Impish:
Invalid
Status in linux-oem-5.17 source package in Impish:
Invalid
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
In Progress
Status in linux-oem-5.14 source package in Jammy:
Invalid
Status in linux-oem-5.17 source package in Jammy:
In Progress
Status in linux source package in Kinetic:
In Progress
Status in linux-oem-5.14 source package in Kinetic:
Invalid
Status in linux-oem-5.17 source package in Kinetic:
Invalid

Bug description:
[Impact]
test_vxlan_under_vrf.sh should not be failing anymore with patches
submitted to fix it in bug 1871015 (unless it's a kernel config
related issue).

With the regression-testing result hinting system available, we should
remove the SAUCE patches that mark "underlay in a VRF" test failure as
an expected failure to catch regressions in the future. This could
reduce maintenance cost as well.

[Fix]
Revert the following patches:
* UBUNTU: SAUCE: selftests: net: Make test for VXLAN underlay in non-default VRF an expected failure
* UBUNTU: SAUCE: selftests: net: Don't fail test_vxlan_under_vrf on xfail

[Test]
Patched test script tested with F/I/J/F-oem-5.14/J-oem-5.17. I have
also modify the test case to fail it deliberately to verify this
change, it works as expected.

[Where problems could occur]
Change limit to test cases, should not have any real impact to any
kernel functions. We may see failures reported from this test in
our SRU regression-testing report in the future, but it means we're
doing the right thing.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/1975691/+subscriptions